New pages

From BigTechWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
New pages
Hide registered users | Hide bots | Hide redirects
(newest | oldest) View ( | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  • 20:11, 11 February 2022Facebook and Mental Health (hist | edit) ‎[7,040 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "*RESEARCH CONSISTENTLY FOUND THAT FACEBOOK AND SOCIAL MEDIA USERS REPORTED LOWER WELL-BEING **A large body of literature linked Facebook use with detrimental outcomes such as decreased mental well-being. A meta study on scientific papers on social media’s influence on mental health found social media use was linked to increased levels of psychological distress, thoughts of self-harm and suicide and poor sleep. One in eight Facebook users reported that their use of the...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 20:09, 11 February 2022Allowing Illegal Actions for Ads (hist | edit) ‎[2,130 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "*Facebook did not take action against human trafficking groups that were on their platform despite being made aware of their presence. A Polish trafficking expert said that he had identified human trafficking on Facebook, but 18 months later there had been no implementation of systems to find and remove trafficking posts *Facebook in fact allowed the human traffickers to spend $152,000 on Facebook ads for massage parlors and deactivated a system that detected human traff...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 20:09, 11 February 2022Failures to Keep Children Safe (hist | edit) ‎[2,958 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "*Instagram and Facebook have failed to keep children safe on their platforms, with high levels of child pornography and “grooming” of underage users. Facebook was responsible for the majority of reported instances of child pornography or trafficking in 2018, and Instagram was cited as the leading platform for child grooming in the U.K. in 2019. **During the COVID-19 pandemic, Instagram failed to respond to complaints about predatory behavior, citing a lack of resourc...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 20:08, 11 February 2022Facebook and User Harm (hist | edit) ‎[11,158 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with " '''Allowing Illegal Actions for Ads''' * Facebook did not take action against human trafficking groups that were on their platform despite being made aware of their presence. A Polish trafficking expert said that he had identified human trafficking on Facebook, but 18 months later there had been no implementation of systems to find and remove trafficking posts * Facebook in fact allowed the human traffickers to spend $152,000 on Facebook ads for massage parlors and d...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 20:04, 11 February 2022Facebook's False Claim To Supporting Regulation (hist | edit) ‎[4,859 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* For years, Facebook’s approach to looming regulatory policy in the U.S. and abroad involved denying any need for regulation at all. ** In 2017, Facebook lobbyists and its allied Internet Association warned that proposed BROWSER Act legislation requiring websites and ISPs to obtain consent from users before sharing their browser data with other entities threatened innovation. * In 2016, less than a month after a judge ruled against Facebook in a lawsuit alleging viola...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 20:02, 11 February 2022NYU Study on Misinformation (hist | edit) ‎[15,734 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* In August 2021, Facebook blocked a team of researchers from NYU’s Ad observatory from accessing their site. The researchers launched a tool enabling users to share data about which political ads the users are shown and why those ads were targeted at them. * The researchers said they were working to “uncover systemic flaws in the Facebook ad library, to identify misinformation in political ads [...] and to study Facebook’s apparent amplification of partisan misin...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 20:01, 11 February 2022Facebook and Whistleblowers (hist | edit) ‎[12,215 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* According to the Wall Street Journal, “Time and again, the documents show, in the U.S. and overseas, Facebook’s own researchers have identified the platform’s ill effects, in areas including teen mental health, political discourse and human trafficking. Time and again, despite congressional hearings, its own pledges and numerous media exposés, the company didn’t fix them. Sometimes the company held back for fear of hurting its business. In other cases, Faceboo...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 19:53, 11 February 2022Facebook's Oversight Committee (hist | edit) ‎[1,410 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Facebook’s Oversight Board Has Been Called Out As A “Toothless” PR Stunt That The Company Used To “[Co-Opt] Advocates And Academics Who Would Otherwise Be More Critical Of The Company.” In 2020, Facebook executives announced a new Oversight Board, which would be tasked with issuing recommendations on controversial content moderation decisions. Referred to by some as Facebook’s “Supreme Court,” the Oversight Board was intended to “help Facebook answer...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 19:42, 11 February 2022Facebook and Small Business (hist | edit) ‎[939 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Facebook’s algorithm has arbitrarily prevented small businesses from advertising, resulting in lost revenue. While larger advertisers can pay for a dedicated account representative, smaller advertisers receive slower customer service. Additionally, Facebook changed its algorithm in 2018 to show users less commercial content, causing small businesses to lose revenue. * Facebook, Instagram, and Google’s YouTube have created arbitrary and discriminatory standards arou...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 19:41, 11 February 2022Facebook Cryptocurrency Not Trusted by Lawmakers (hist | edit) ‎[6,598 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "'''Democrats''' * In May 2019, Sen. Sherod Brown questioned how Facebook would protect the privacy of its cryptocurrency users. He also demanded clarity on Facebook’s intentions for its crypto project. * In June 2019, Sen. Brown said Facebook was “too big and too powerful” and said the company could not be allowed to run a risky new cryptocurrency without proper oversight. * In June 2019, Chair of the House Financial Services Committee Maxine Waters called on Fac...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 19:34, 11 February 2022Facebook Facing Pressure from Consumers, Regulators (hist | edit) ‎[4,608 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with " Democrats * Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) said Big Data posed “serious implications for healthy competitive marketplaces” and called on antitrust agencies to “place greater emphasis on determining the competitive impact of obtaining even more data through mergers.” Klobuchar said Big Tech companies like Facebook were “powerful internet gatekeepers” that kept small businesses in check. * Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) said Facebook was a “monopoly” that was u...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 19:10, 11 February 2022Facebook Operating as a Monopoly (hist | edit) ‎[9,670 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "RECENT COURT DECISION AGAINST FTC DIDN’T DENY FACEBOOK WAS A MONOPOLY * Although a judge ruled against the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in its antitrust case against Facebook, the judge’s ruling did not rule on whether Facebook was a monopoly and it allowed the FTC to retry its argument. * An analysis of the judge’s ruling by Brookings noted how the case underscored how current antitrust law provides carveouts for “lawful monopolies.” From Brookings, “The...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 19:08, 11 February 2022Apple and Taxes (hist | edit) ‎[1,411 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Apple Avoided Taxes By Creating Three Offshore Corporations In Ireland, A Known Tax Haven. * Apple Used A “Cost-Sharing Agreement” With Its Irish Subsidiaries, Which Transferred Part Ownership Of Intellectual Property Created In The U.S. To Ireland To Avoid Paying Taxes In The U.S. * Apple Also Used A Tax Loophole Which Allowed them To Declare To The IRS That Its Three Offshore Subsidiaries Were One Company. * Forbes: Apple “Has Become Famous Over The Years For D...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 19:07, 11 February 2022Apple and China (hist | edit) ‎[1,406 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Apple was said to be a “power tool in China’s vast censorship operation” going so far as to hand over its Chinese user’s personal data. The New York Times said Apple had worked to create “a bureaucracy that ha[d] become a powerful tool in China’s vast censorship operations.” Apple agreed to store the personal data of its Chinese customers on computer servers run by a state-owned Chinese firm. Apple’s compromises with the Chinese government made it “ne...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 19:06, 11 February 2022Apple and National Security (hist | edit) ‎[395 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* A majority of Americans owned an Apple product, with the average household owning at least two of them. * In 2017, it was found that 64% of Americans owned an Apple product, with the average household owning 2.6 Apple products. 52% of all smartphones used in the U.S. were iPhones.") Tag: Visual edit
  • 19:04, 11 February 2022Apple and Workers (hist | edit) ‎[1,752 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* In 2019, Apple admitted to breaking Chinese labor law by employing too many temporary workers at the world’s largest iPhone factory. * Nonprofit advocacy group China Labor Watch accused Apple and Foxconn of labor violations, including withholding bonus payments, rolling back safety training, and employing more  temporary workers than China’s laws allowed, The Washington Post reported.") Tag: Visual edit
  • 19:03, 11 February 2022Apple and the Auto Industry (hist | edit) ‎[1,645 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Apple was already making serious auto industry in-roads and at a stroke has changed entire markets. * The Wall  Street Journal said Apple sought to “control every aspect of the user experience” and at a stroke changed entire  markets when it rolled out the iPhone and iTunes. * Apple’s mysterious plans could mean it was working on a car,  tech platform, or mobility service, but as of Spring 2021, Bloomberg reported Apple prioritized plans for the “Apple Car...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 19:02, 11 February 2022Apple and Privacy (hist | edit) ‎[15,653 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with " '''Apple failed to protect their users''' * Apple said the iPhone was a “highly personal device” and promised they had “design[ed] security into the core” of their platforms. Apple said safety and privacy was “of critical importance to users” and said they designed security into the core of its platforms. Apple claimed their devices protected their “entire ecosystem, including everything users do locally, on networks and with key internet services.” Ap...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:58, 11 February 2022Apple and Small Business (hist | edit) ‎[933 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* In 2018, Amazon and Apple struck a deal that led to the removal of repair shops selling refurbished Apple products on Amazon, harming “hundreds if not thousands” of small repairers. Apple made repair shops pay to become “authorized service providers” and has lobbied against right-to-repair legislation. * Apple controls 71% of spending in the U.S. app market while Google controls the rest, harming innovation and raising costs for consumers. Small app developers...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:58, 11 February 2022Apple and Consumers (hist | edit) ‎[664 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* To be in it’s App Store, Apple only allows payment through it’s own payment method and doesn’t allow developers to contact consumers, to tell them about lower prices or offer competitive pricing. This has led people to call them a monopoly in a classic sense. * The IPhone is vulnerable to hacks and the public has been misled about it’s security. * The App Store is also vulnerable to scam and ripoff apps. The review process has been called “feeble” and since...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:50, 11 February 2022Amazon and National Security (hist | edit) ‎[701 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* The cloud services space was dominated by Amazon, who had billions of dollars worth of contracts with federal defense agencies like the Department of Defense. Amazon held nearly 34% of the worldwide cloud computer market. Amazon was the dominant cloud provider for federal agencies, the Department of Defense and the intelligence community. The NSA awarded Amazon a secret cloud computing contract worth up to $10 billion. Even the CIA used Amazon’s cloud services. The c...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:49, 11 February 2022Amazon and Taxes (hist | edit) ‎[1,205 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* In 2020, Amazon Saved $639 Million Using Various Tax Credits * Amazon Gave Employees Restricted Stock Grants, Which Allowed It To Take Tax Deductions. * In 2020, Amazon Saved $1.8 Billion Using Tax Breaks For Stock Options. * From 2018 To 2020, Amazon Used Depreciation Breaks To Avoid Paying Taxes, Which Allowed It To Deduct The Costs Of Investments In Equipment More Quickly Than The Equipment Wore Out. * 2011 To 2016: Amazon Spent More Than $160 Billion On Investments...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:49, 11 February 2022Amazon and Workers (hist | edit) ‎[546 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Throughout Amazon’s 27-Year Existence It Used “Hard-Nosed Tactics From A Well Worn Playbook” To Stop Union Drives Says the Washington Post: “Among other problems, unions could dent the company’s flexibility, limiting its ability to rapidly hire and cut workers to meet shopping demands that spike and recede throughout the year,” said former company executives who spoke on the condition of anonymity to talk candidly about internal policy.") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:48, 11 February 2022Amazon and the Auto Industry (hist | edit) ‎[856 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Amazon was already making in-roads in the auto industry and had the most to gain from AV deliveries. In June 2020, Amazon acquired Zoox for $1.2 billion to design autonomous ride-hailing vehicles. In December 2018, Zoox Inc. received the first California permit to transport vehicles in self-driving cars. * In October 2020, Amazon  unveiled its first all-electric van built by electric vehicle (EV) startup Rivian, with an expected 10,000 vans on roads as soon as 2022,...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:46, 11 February 2022Amazon and Small Business (hist | edit) ‎[938 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Amazon’s monopoly has allowed it to raise fees on third-party sellers by 11% from 2015 to 2020. Additionally, Amazon uses data from its third-party sellers to launch competing products and undercut the work of small businesses. Third-party sellers have reported that Amazon can arbitrarily suspend their accounts, leading to a “death knell.” Because of this, some third-party sellers fear retaliation from Amazon. * In 2018, Amazon and Apple struck a deal that led to...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:46, 11 February 2022Amazon and Consumers (hist | edit) ‎[994 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with " '''Self-preferencing as a harm to consumers''' * European Governments Crack Down On Self-Preferencing Behavior From Big Tech * The Italian government fined Amazon $1.3 billion for breaking antitrust law by self- preferencing – incentivizing third-party merchants to use it proprietary fulfillment system. ** In addition to the fine, Italian regulators ordered Amazon to offer third-party merchants the same sales and visibility opportunities as merchants using its fulf...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:42, 11 February 2022Big Tech and Algorithmic Bias (hist | edit) ‎[4,127 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Recent Movement From U.S. Cities To Push Back On Algorithmic Bias ** District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine introduced a bill to bar companies from using discriminatory algorithms in key areas, including access to employment, education, housing, healthcare, insurance and credit. *** Racine observed that algorithms can “reflect and replicate historical bias, exacerbating existing inequalities and harming marginalized communities.” ** New York City Council...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:39, 11 February 2022Big Tech and Taxes (hist | edit) ‎[3,251 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* A Study By Fair Tax Mark, A British Organization That Certified Businesses For Good Tax Conduct, Found That Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Google, And Microsoft Had A Combined “Tax Gap” Of More Than $100 Billion From 2010 To 2019. * “Tax Gap” Referred To The Difference Between A Company’s Tax Provisions, Or Amount They Set Aside For Taxes In Their Financial Reports, And The Amount They Actually Paid To The Government. * 2010 – 2017: The Six Companies Exa...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:37, 11 February 2022Big Tech as the New Big Tobacco (hist | edit) ‎[23,467 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS BEGAN TO VIEW BIG TECH IN THE LIGHT BIG TOBACCO WAS, WITH ONE SAYING THE COMPARISON WAS “AN APPROPRIATE ANALOGY” ** Lawmakers like Republicans Ken Buck and Cynthia Lummis and Democrat Ed Markey compared Facebook and Big Tech to Big Tobacco. Markey described Instagram as “that first childhood cigarette, meant to get teens hooked early.” Lummis agreed that comparing Facebook and Big Tech to Big Tobacco was an “appropriate analogy.” R...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:25, 11 February 2022Big Tech Lying to Congress (hist | edit) ‎[2,114 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Big Tech ** 2018: Senate Intelligence Committee Report Concluded That Social Media Companies Including Facebook, Twitter & Google “Misrepresented Or Evaded” In Statements To Congress About Russian Influence. * Facebook ** 2021: Facebook Exec Claimed No Internal Concealment Of Docs – Later Reporting Showed Facebook Locking Down Internal Message Boards. ** 2021: Blumenthal: Facebook Provided “Clearly Evasive And Misleading Answers” On Teen Mental Health And...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:23, 11 February 2022Big Tech and Anti-Vax Misinformation (hist | edit) ‎[10,369 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* COVID vaccine misinformation continues to proliferate on social media and has driven down vaccination rates, leading to a major uptick in COVID cases in the U.S. * The World Health Organization has ranked vaccine hesitancy as a top threat to global health. The U.S. Surgeon General said misinformation on COVID vaccines presented “a clear and present danger” to those who needed to be protected from COVID. Dr. Fauci went so far as to say that Smallpox and Polio wouldn...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:18, 11 February 2022Big Tech and Spanish Language Misinformation (hist | edit) ‎[9,730 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Big Tech Companies Have Enabled Spanish Language Misinformation To Spread Across Social Media, Prompting Outrage From Activists And Lawmakers. ** Social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube have made it easy to share dangerous misinformation online, and the issue has only worsened due to the polarized political climate in the United States. While big tech companies have made strides to combat the spread of misinformation, their efforts have fallen short...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:17, 11 February 2022Lack of Latinos in Big Tech (hist | edit) ‎[6,939 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Apple ** Since releasing workforce demographic data in 2014, Hispanic and Latino workers have consistently been underrepresented in tech & leadership roles at Apple. ** 2014 data found that only 6% of Apple executives were Latino, while 64% were white. ** 2015 data once again found that Apple leadership was overwhelmingly white, and that company had failed to increase Hispanic representation in its workforce. Wired: Apple remained “mostly male and white, especially a...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:12, 11 February 2022Big Tech and Climate (hist | edit) ‎[3,923 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "All Four Big Tech Companies Are Major Purveyors Of Climate Misinformation: * Amazon: In 2021, Amazon’s algorithm promoted books denying the existence of climate change. * Apple: Apple does not allow users to report episodes in its Podcasts app for misinformation. A search of “climate change fake,” “climate change hoax,” and “climate scam” in the Podcasts app yielded episodes promoting climate misinformation. Additionally, one of the Top 100 Podcasts episod...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:11, 11 February 2022Small Business Support of Regulation (hist | edit) ‎[8,324 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Hundreds of thousands of independent and small businesses have joined together to back antitrust and enforcement. ** Apr. 2021: Small Business Rising (SBR), a coalition of 150,000 small & independent businesses across the country, launched to urge congress pass stricter antitrust laws. ** Oct. 2021: Main Street Against Big Tech (MSABT) launched to debunk big tech’s cynical PR efforts and show how small business owners were at the mercy of dominant corporations. *** T...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:10, 11 February 2022Big Tech and Regulation (hist | edit) ‎[23,016 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* SENATORS KLOBUCHAR AND GRASSLEY INTRODUCED A BILL TO KEEP BIG TECH FROM USING THEIR DOMINANCE TO SQUELCH COMPETITION AND DISADVANTAGE RIVALS KLOBUCHAR AND GRASSLEY’S BILL WAS WIDELY SUPPORTED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE, WITH 5 REPUBLICANS AND 5 DEMOCRATS CO-SPONSORING IT ** Klobuchar and Grassley introduced the ‘American Innovation And Choice Online Act’ (AICOA) which would create rules for dominant tech platforms to prevent anti-competitive behavior. A CNBC head...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:08, 11 February 2022Further Concerns (hist | edit) ‎[1,275 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Lawmakers, regulators and even bank lobby groups like the Consumer Bankers Association have expressed concerns that due to Big Tech’s foray into financial services, a growing share of banking activity has occurred outside the purview of regulators, putting consumers and the resiliency of the financial system at risk. * Regulators worried Big Tech was too big to fail and could cause the next financial collapse Companies like Amazon and Google host most banking activit...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:07, 11 February 2022Consumer Financial Bureau Regulation (hist | edit) ‎[1,335 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* In October 2021, CFPB issued an order to Apple, Facebook, Google and Amazon to compel them to turn over information on their payments systems. * The CFPB raised antitrust concerns with Big Tech’s dive into payments and wanted to make sure the companies didn’t “squelch” smaller competitors. * CFPB Director Rohit Chopra worried the US could become like China, where consumers have lost the ability to choose which payments app they use because Tech Giants AliPay an...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:06, 11 February 2022Apple Card and Apple Pay (hist | edit) ‎[1,329 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* In 2019, Apple Card, a partnership with Goldman Sachs was accused of discriminating against women, with customers complaining on Twitter that women were granted lower credit limits than men, including married couples with only joint bank accounts. * A NY Department of Financial Services investigation concluded in March 2021 and found that Apple Card did not intentionally discriminate against women. * While Apple Pay, according to the Financial Times, has “attracted l...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:05, 11 February 2022Facebook Libra/Crypto (hist | edit) ‎[1,141 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Facebook had to rebrand its crypto project amid a series of setbacks, including major financial backers dropping out over regulatory concerns. The crypto project also has faced bipartisan criticism from US regulators and lawmakers. * President Trump argued Libra would have little standing or dependability and said Facebook should be subject to banking regulations. * Jerome Powell, the head of the Federal Reserve, said he was concerned Facebook’s cryptocurrency would...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 18:01, 11 February 2022Amazon (hist | edit) ‎[2,360 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* According to CNBC, the company’s plan to brand the accounts under the names of partner banks showed their key motivation was customer data and being able to see what consumers spend their money on in order to get a leg up on Amazon in the online search battle. * The checking accounts were never actually launched and were scrapped in October 20201 after several missed deadlines. * In July 2016, Amazon joined Wells Fargo to offer private student loans to prime members,...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 17:59, 11 February 2022Big Tech entering Financial Services (hist | edit) ‎[724 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* According to CNBC, tech giants leap into the financial services sector has been more of a “slow creep than big strides,” with the companies mostly adding services that are peripheral to banking. * The tech giants have faced numerous obstacles along the way, with consumers growing increasingly skeptical over providing large technology companies with their personal information. * And while they’ve pushed deeper into the financial sector, Big Tech has tried to avoid...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 17:58, 11 February 2022Google Pay (hist | edit) ‎[943 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* While Google is the subject of antitrust allegations over its digital advertising business in the US, in other parts of the world, it has faced allegations of unfairly promoting its payments app, Google Pay. * In India, Google is being investigated by India’s antitrust body for abusing its market power to promote Google Pay, as well as for forcing App developers to use Google Pay. * Google also faced controversy in India when for 8 hours it pulled from its App Store...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 17:57, 11 February 2022Possible Solutions (hist | edit) ‎[1,115 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Outlets and institutions believed national security would be strengthened if Big Tech was broken up and regulated. Fears had grown that market concentration in Big Tech meant Americans were less able to compete with foreign rivals because it meant “less competition and therefore less innovation.” In a fractured tech market, it was believed the various companies would use various resources, develop domestic capacities or if nothing else, choose not to work with Chin...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 17:55, 11 February 2022Hacks and Vulnerabilities as a Security Threat (hist | edit) ‎[4,426 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* A hack at one of the big tech companies could “derail everyday life” or “even compromise public safety, in fundamental ways.” As AI increasingly matured, hacking was expected to get easier, stealthier and more widespread. It was estimated that hackers would increase their use of AI and automation in the years ahead and use AI to create intelligent malware programs and execute stealth attacks. More concerning, the proliferation of AI was thought to lead to an in...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 17:54, 11 February 2022Disinformation and Big Tech as a Security Threat (hist | edit) ‎[10,748 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Disinformation was a major national security threat due to its ability to boost our adversaries and sow discord and division in America. The American Security Project posited that the propagation of disinformation “could work towards increasing Russian and Chinese spheres of influence.” They further stated that disinformation risked “negatively impacting the U.S.’s standing in the world a global leader and cooperative partner. The New Yorker described online di...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 17:14, 11 February 2022Big Tech and National Security (hist | edit) ‎[3,789 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Multiple scholars and institutions had noted the risk big tech posed to America’s national security. * Columbia University said the size and dominance of American tech companies were “part of the problem” when it came to the implications of their products on national security. The Carnegie Endowment For International Peace said Big Tech companies had “taken many actions that contravene[d] U.S. interests, then relied on their clout to avoid accountability.” St...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 17:09, 11 February 2022Big Tech's lobbying vs other Toxic Industries (hist | edit) ‎[1,593 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* Since 2000, the four largest Big Tech companies – Amazon, Apple, Alphabet/Google, and Facebook – have spent $465,026,307 on federal lobbying. ** $434,474,221 of that total has come since 2010. * Additionally, nine groups that the four Big Tech companies fund have spent $98,061,827 on federal lobbying since 2000. ** $80,400,019 of that total has come since 2010. * Big Tech’s federal lobbying total eclipses that of other major toxic industries: ** Since 2010, the n...") Tag: Visual edit
  • 23:37, 10 February 2022Think Tanks Receiving Money to Influence Public Policy/Research (hist | edit) ‎[18,907 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Test text")
  • 22:47, 10 February 2022Trade/Proxy Organizations funded by Big Tech (hist | edit) ‎[23,858 bytes]Btw admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Test text here")
(newest | oldest) View ( | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)